Clinical Trial: Digital Versus Conventional Full-arch Implant Impression in Maxillary Screw- Retained Implant Prosthesis

Study Status: Completed
Recruit Status: Completed
Study Type: Interventional




Official Title: Clinical Assessment of Maxillary Screw-retained Implant Prosthesis Fabricated From Digital Versus Conventional Full-arch Implant Impression: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Brief Summary: 28 participants with edentulous maxillary arches were randomly selected and enrolled in two equal groups; Group I conventional impression group (CIG) and Group II Digital impression group (DIG). All patients were rehabilitated with maxillary screw-retained implant prosthesis retained by 6 implants. Prosthodontic complications and peri-implant MBL were registered at 6,12, and 24 months (m). Data was collected and statistically analyzed.