Clinical Trial: Interest to Perform a Renal Biopsy Early in the Course of the Henoch-Schoenlein Nephritis

Study Status: Recruiting
Recruit Status: Recruiting
Study Type: Observational




Official Title: Interest to Perform a Renal Biopsy Early in the Course of the Henoch-Schoenlein Nephritis

Brief Summary:

Henoch-Schönlein (HS) purpura is a common cause of renal glomerular injury in children. This condition is responsible for 10-15% of glomerulonephritis in children. The outcome is generally favorable, but up to 5% of patients develop kidney failure. The outcome of patients with kidney biopsy is less favorable with 7-50% of them progressing to chronic renal failure.

Prevalence of HS is difficult to determine from literature. Annual incidence is estimated at 6.1 / 100,000 children in the Netherlands and up to 20.4 / 100 000 children in the United Kingdom. The proportion of children with HS who develop renal disease is difficult to determine because the numbers reported in the literature are variable and depend greatly on the type of the reporting center, whether or not specialized in pediatric nephrology. Thus the proportion of renal disease varies from 20% to 100% of children with a HS.

The treatment of HS nephropathy (HSN) usually depends on the severity of histological lesions but histological classification is discussed and there is currently no consensus. Randomized studies are scarce and often do not allow to draw clear conclusions. A meta-analysis suggested a positive effect of corticosteroids on renal prognosis of severe forms but in this study the definition of renal disease was very heterogeneous. The only classification of the HSN recognized is from the International Study Group of Kidney Disease in Childhood (ISKDC) which is the following: grade I: minimal glomerula abnormalities, grade II: pure proliferation, grade III: crescents/ segmental lesions <50%,grade IV: crescents/ segmental lesions 50 to 75%, grade V: crescents/ segmental lesions > 75%, grade VI: pseudomesangiocapillary. However, this classification is questioned because it ignores other significant histological lesions such as interstitial f